From The Private Albert Einstein by Peter A. Bucky
with Allen G. Weakland, Andrews and McMeel, Kansas City, 1992, pp 85 - 87.
This book contains the record of various conversations between Bucky and
Einstein over a thirty year period. BUCKY:
It's ironic that your namc has been synonymous with science in the
twentieth century, and yet there has always been a lot of controversy
surrounding you in relation to religious questions. How do you account
for this unusual circumstance, since science and religion are usually
thought to be at odds?
Well, I do not think that it is necessarily the case that science and
religion are natural opposites. In fact, I think that there is a very
close connection between the two. Further, I think that science without
religion is lame and, conversely, that religion without science is
blind. Both are important and should work hand-in-hand. It seems to mc
that whoever doesn't wonder about the truth in religion and in science
might as well be dead.
So then, you consider yourself to be a religious man?
I believe in mystery and, frankly, I sometimes face this mystery with
great fear. In other words, I think that there are many things in the
universe that we cannot perceive or penetrate and that also we
experience some of the most beautiful things in life in only a very
primitive form. Only in relation to these mysteries do I consider myself
to be a religious man. But I sense these things deeply. What I cannot
understand is how there could possibly be a God who would reward or
punish his subjects or who could induce us to develop our will in our
You don't believe in God, then?
this is what I mean about religion and science going hand-in-hand! Each
has a place, but each must be relegated to its sphere. Let's assume that
we are dealing with a theoretical physicist or scientist who is very
well-acquainted with the different laws of the universe, such as how the
planets orbit the sun and how the satellites in turn orbit around their
respective planets. Now, this man who has studied and understands these
different laws-how could he possibly believe in one God who would be
capable of disturbing the paths of these great orbiting masses? No, the
natural laws of science have not only been worked out theoretically but
have been proven also in practice. I cannot then believe in this concept
of an anthropomorphic God who has the powers of interfering with these
natural laws. As I said before, the most beautiful and most profound
religious emotion that we can experience is the sensation of the
mystical. And this mysticality is the power of all true science. If
there is any such concept as a God, it is a subtle spirit, not an image
of a man that so many have fixed in their minds. In essence, my religion
consists of a humble admiration for this illimitable superior spirit
that reveals itself in the slight details that we are able to perceive
with our frail and feeble minds .
Do you think perhaps that most people need religion to keep them in
check, so to speak?
No, clearly not. I do not believe that a man should be restrained in
his daily actions by being afraid of punishment after death or that he
should do things only because in this way he will be rewarded after he
dies. This does not make sense. The proper guidance during the life of a
man should be the weight that he puts upon ethics and the amount of
consideration that he has for others. Education has a great role to play
in this respect. Religion should have nothing to do with a fear of
living or a fear of death, but should instead be a striving after
And yet, with all of these thoughts, you are still identified
strongly in the public mind as definitely Jewish and this certainly is a
very traditional religion.
Actually, my first religious training of any kind was in the Catholic
catechism. A fluke, of course, only because the primary school that I
first went to was a Catholic one. I was, as a matter of fact, the only
Jewish child in the school. This actually worked to my advantage, since
it made it easier for me to isolate myself from the rest of the class
and find that comfort in solitude that I so cherished.
But don't you find any discrepancy between your previous somewhat
anti-religious statements and your willingness to be identified publicly
as a Jew?
Not necessarily. Actually it is a very difficult thing to even define
a Jew. The closest that I can come to describing it is to ask you to
visualize a snail. A snail that you see at the ocean consists of the
body that is snuggled inside of the house which it always carries around
with it. But let's picture what would happen if we lifted the shell off
of the snail. Would we not still describe the unprotected body as a
snail? In just the same way, a Jew who sheds his faith along the way, or
who even picks up a different one, is still a Jew.
You were the focus of much attack on the part of the Nazis in Germany
because of your Jewishness. What explanation have you come up with for
why the Jews have been hated so much throughout history?
It seems obvious to me that Jews make an ideal scapegoat for any
country experiencing social, economic, or political difficulties. The
reason for this is twofold. First of all, there is hardly a country in
the world that does not have a Jewish segment in the population. And
secondly, wherever Jews reside, they are a minority of the population,
and a small minority at that, so that they are not powerful enough to
defend themselves against a mass attack. It is very easy for governments
to divert attention from their own mistakes by blaming Jews for this or
that political theory, such as communism or socialism. For instance,
after the First World War, many Germans accused the Jews first of
starting the war and then of losing it. This is nothing new, of course.
Throughout history, Jews have been accused of all sorts of treachery,
such as poisoning water wells or murdering children as religious
sacrifices. Much of this can be attributed to jealousy, because, despite
the fact that Jewish people have always been thinly populated in various
countries, they have always had a disproportionate number of outstanding
Editorial comments in this section on Einstein are by
Prof. Arnold V. Lesikar, Physics Dept., St. Cloud State University, St.
Cloud, MN 56301-4498. He would appreciate any feedback or comments.